(a) General
language awareness – linguistic & sociolinguistic features
(b) Critical
language awareness – social & political factors
The British Movement – Language Awareness (LA) movement
1975
report of the Bullock Committee
Donmall
1985, p. 7: “A person’s sensitivity to and conscious awareness of the nature of
language and its role in human life.”
Eric
Hawkins (1984, p. 6): “We are trying to light
fires of curiosity about the central human characteristic of language which
will blaze throughout our pupil’s
lives. While combating linguistic
complacency, we are seeking to arm our pupils against fear of
the unknown which breeds prejudice and antagonism.”
The American Movement – Whole Language movement
Integrating
four language skills + language related content across school curriculum
Various
components of language such as sounds,
words, phrases and sentences
should be taught holistically
using authentic materials and meaningful activities that resonate with learners
and their daily life.
Holistic
= characterized by comprehension of the parts of
something as intimately interconnected and explicable only by reference to the
whole.
Ken Goodman (1986, p.27): “Whole
language is whole. It does not exclude some
languages, some dialects, or some registers because their speakers lack status
in a particular society. Every language form constitutes a precious
linguistic resource for its users.
This does not mean that whole language teachers are not aware of the
social values assigned to different language varieties and how these affect
people who use them. But they can put these social values in
perspective.”
WHAT DOES
THE TERM WHOLE LANGUAGE MEAN? CONSTRUCTING A DEFINITION FROM THE LITERATURE
Whole language has as its foundation many concepts drawn from early
philosophers in education. In her report of the historical roots of whole
language, Yetta Goodman (1989) stated that "those who call ourselves
whole-language proponents today discover our roots in the humanistic and scientific beliefs of those who came before"
(p. 125). Goodman cited: Comenius's concern for learner-centered
pedagogy, Piaget's
support for children's active role in learning, Vygotsky's belief in the
relationship between the learning and of the individual student and influences of
the social context, and Halliday's support for contextual learning
as each contributing to the concept of whole language. In addition, Dewey's
contributions to whole language can be traced through his support for
reflective teaching, learning centered
education, and the integration of the language arts within the curriculum
(Y. Goodman, 1989) as well as for his support for learning by doing (Hildreth, 1965).
Yetta Goodman (1989) the
whole language is simply language experience with a new label.
The
language-experience approach (LEA) was described four decades ago as
one that ‘makes much of this sequence of meaningful
relationships through which it guides the learner and strives to develop
his personal identification with the experience and with the functional uses of relevant language”.
No comments:
Post a Comment